Showing posts with label Chris Fritz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Fritz. Show all posts

Monday, September 20, 2010

Gaming in the classroom: Rock Band


Recently, I have been thinking a lot about the use of video games in the classroom. Because the kids love the opportunity to actually use class time to play games, engagement on their behalf is easily attainable. I see this as potentially one of the greatest arguments for gaming in the classroom.


However, it's important to remember that while engagement is necessary, it is not sufficient in developing a classroom around real learning. The best classrooms are not just about engaging the kids. With that, I see two challenges to gaming in the classroom. Firstly, the challenge sometimes is to make sure that the games are mindful and supportive of our learning (there are a lot of mindless games out there). Secondly, the kids sometimes need a lot of guidance in their reflections of the game to be aware just how much learning is in fact going on.

So here's what I tried:

Our two grade 6 classes joined together to play Rock Band 2 on the X Box for 45 minutes. Collectively, we figured out the fairest way to decide who should have a turn. Everyone agreed that if someone had not had a turn, they should get precedence to someone who had already played. Even though no one dared disagree with this, the kids had to regulate and remind a few students that they had already played. I observed this but never interfered with their autonomy. (Keep in mind I was observing in case someone did try to play more than their share - and had they tried without another student calling them on it, I would have asked them to reflect upon their actions. I would have also asked students why they did not speak up)

Because singing is sometimes the most intimidating role to play on Rock Band, I suggested that if people were gutsy enough to sing, then they are gutsy enough to pick the song. 

The first song the kids played was Eye of the Tiger by Survivor. The second song was Should I Stay or Should I Go by the Clash. We then stopped for lunch. I told the kids to think over the lunch hour about why playing Rock Band during class time is a good use of our time. While the kids ate, I whipped up a quick blog post for our class Ning. Here is what I wrote:
When you think of traditional school, not many people would think that Rock Band could help students learn; however, there are a lot of ways Rock Band could be used to support learning in the classroom. Here are a couple of my reasons:
1. Playing and learning together is very important. None of us are as smart as all of us, and this is why it is so important to learn how to play together. When we played Rock Band today, many students were shy and nervous about playing in front of their peers. When you play Rock Band, you get a chance to see how failing in front of your peers does not have to be scary. The classroom should be a safe place where collaboration is normal. I saw many of you go out of your way to comfort and support those who were hesitant.

2. The lyrics from the songs are inspirational. They make you think of things that have happened in your life. For example, the song Should I Stay or Should I Go has a lot to do with my life. At the end of last school year, I was asked if I would accept a transfer to a new school. For the first time in my teaching career, I needed to choose to stay or go. This was not an easy decision for me because Westpark had become like a second home for me.
Eye of the Tiger was a very interesting song because it connects to the video that Mr. Cunningham shared with us. I googled the lyrics and found them here. I found the lyric "Just a man and his will to survive" as very powerful. In this world, challenges, problems and hardship are the norm. Anyone who plays the game of life without failure or mistakes isn't really playing the game. Perseverance maybe one of the most important characteristics anyone can have. 
I can think of a few more but I think I'll place them in another blog post.
I shared this post with them because I wanted to model for them how you could write about this for more than one sentence (Brevity has not been a problem with my students' writing). I also wanted to model how to give a link to another website (my kids are not that tech savvy), and I wanted to connect the game to other media that we've already used in class. (see the video below)

As a class, we discussed why some students would be hesitant to play. Many could see fear of failure and embarrassment as very real concerns. In fact, a couple students were so nervous, they couldn't even be in the room when we started playing. With some artful guidance from my colleague Richard, we convinced them to give watching a try. 

We also discussed the importance of perseverance in the face of failure. Eye of the Tiger as their first song worked out nicely because it led into a follow up conversation about this video that had been uploaded to our Ning:


Later on in the day, we were playing some games that focused on teaching my students how to type (they mostly hunt and peck). That's when Jake suggested that keeping your fingers on the home row required similar dexterity to when you play guitar on Rock Band. I thought that was very cool.

Had a stranger walked by and poked their head into my classroom, they would have seen what looked like chaos - kids were talking, music was blaring and drums were banging. But if that stranger cared to scratch the surface by asking the kids some questions, listening to our class discussions or reading their blog posts, I think they would have discovered real learning (purposeful chaos) was taking place in a context and for a purpose.

Oh, and we also played Mirror's Edge in the afternoon. I'll blog about that tomorrow.


For more on video gaming in the classroom, check out Chris Fritz's post on gaming and Will Richardson's post about the New York Times Magazine that featured gaming in the classroom.



Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Grading Moratorium: Chris Fritz

Chris Fritz has joined the Grading Moratorium.Want to join? Here's how.

Name: Chris Fritz

East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Content Areas: Technology and German











At what stage of the abolish grading game are you?

I no longer grade. At all. But I also no longer work in the public school system. I teach college courses, after-school courses to middle and high schoolers, and week-long camps. None of this is for-credit, but that doesn't mean we slack off. Being non-credit is great for a few reasons:
  1. We get a certain freedom of curriculum, so we don't have to cover exactly what's on the syllabus, and students don't all have to do the same work, or even learn the same skills and material.
  2. Students come into the classroom really wanting to learn. They're not playing the accreditation game. No fulfilling requirements. No filling out their semester. They're there to learn a truly useful skill or to explore something they're deeply interested in.
When I was working in the public school system, at the high school level, I actually thought grading was a necessary evil. It really never even occurred to me that I could not grade in that system. I had never heard of teachers like Joe, who make it work in the public school system, so I got out as quickly as I could. Now of course, I know abolishing grades in public schools is very possible, but I'm still happy where I am.

Why do you want to or why did you abolish grading?

For a long time, I didn't know exactly what it was about grading that bugged me. It just seemed to cheapen the experience of learning. Even as a student, grading just seemed wrong. The problem is I love learning, I'm really good at it, and I'm a relentlessly critical thinker. That's unfortunately not a great combination in a traditional school setting, whether you're a student or teacher.
The grading system is ultimately about simplifying your knowledge and skills down to a simple number and comparing you to the student next to you, and for that, it requires, or assumes really, that the instructor knows how you learn best, when you learn best, and even what you already know and still have to learn. I knew that was bullshit as a student, but when I tried to be more involved in my learning, few instructors were open to my suggestions for alternative assignments - they needed standardized assignments to make the grading system work. So I knew even then that grades were getting in the way of learning, and was beginning to realize that the system doesn't eventolerate a passion for learning.
Later, as a teacher, when I finally did start hearing about alternatives to grading and about teachers that didn't grade at all, I was extremely ready to ditch grades!

What do you do in place of grading?

I have students practice real skills and if they're having problems, they try to figure out what's going wrong, do some more research, brainstorm with another student, or as a last resort, even consult me. In my German courses, students know they've learned when they can communicate in a new way, or in a new context. In my tech courses - well, if you're learning to install a new operating system, you know you can do that when you've just done it! It's pretty simple.
So you may be thinking now, "Well, that sounds great, but how do others know what a student has learned? What can they show educational institutions and employers?" Great question! My answer is three words: published student work. If proving what they can do is a concern, simply build up portfolios of their work and publish it online. You can also publish videos of presentations or of a great explanation/demonstration of how to do something or how something works. After all, there's no better way to learn something than to teach it, and you can use those videos in future lessons. So students show what they can do and get references from people they use their skills to help, just like anywhere else apart from education.

What fears did you have about abolishing grading?

Oh, I had lie-awake-at-night fears that students wouldn't do anything without grades and they'd think I was a horrible teacher. It helps a lot though, that students come in without the expectation that they should be graded, as the courses I teach are all non-credit. That really makes it a cakewalk.

What challenges did you encounter with abolishing grading?

Well, I first tried doing less grading in an accredited college course. I phased out everything except the exams I had to give out. That did not work well. I learned that if you grade even occasionally, students are still distracted from learning. I heard a lot of, "Is this going to be on the exam?" that semester. Maybe it would have worked better in public school at a grade where students have the same teacher all day, but a few hours per week of only-kind-of grading was not at all sufficient to get students re-focused on learning. Many still just wanted to do as little work as possible for a grade they deemed acceptable. Some didn't even show up except when we had an exam and then they'd inevitably fail. It was pretty rough.

Are you willing to speak with others who are interested in abolishing grading?

Definitely!